Prefab Green Homes are Affordable Small Space Living
Clayton Homes, based in Maryville, Tenn., is one of America’s largest manufacturers of mobile homes and prefabricated housing. So when President Kevin Clayton wanted to go green, he gave his architects a free hand, instructing them to incorporate as many green products as possible and to produce a home that was super energy-efficient — the only constraint was that it had to be something that could be built in existing facilities.
The result was the Clayton I-House, an innovative prefab home that can be powered for a dollar a day, thanks to Low-E windows, solar augmentation, high-efficiency appliances and superior insulation. The solar panels on the roof don’t supply all the home’s needs, but they do cut electricity consumption in half. There’s also a tank- less water heater and a cistern that collects rainwater from the roof for use in gardening, car washing or other outdoor uses. Floors are made of fast-growing bamboo, and paint and insulation are low/zero emission.
The basic I-House is 992 square feet, though the design’s blend of indoor and outdoor space makes it seem bigger. Though final prices haven’t been set, Clayton hopes to deliver it for about $100,000. But the “core” unit can be expanded by adding additional rooms in different configurations to suit the buyer’s needs and the character of the lot — placing rooms above one another to accommodate, for example, a hillside. Clayton Vice President Chris Nicely says the goal is to allow as much customization — both in configuration and interiors — as possible. It can be set on a traditional foundation, for example, or it can sit on piers driven into the ground.
The Clayton folks see the typical customer for the I-House as being younger and more affluent than traditional mobile-home buyers. The interior and exterior are attractive, looking like something from a high-end home show, not the kind of disposable mobile home you’d see coming from the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
The house more closely resembles a product that you might buy from Ikea. In fact, it is a house you might buy from Ikea: Kevin Clayton is a fan of the Scandinavian furniture company, and Clayton Homes is exploring a partnership with Ikea that would feature display models at Ikea stores and even allow people to design and order their own I-Houses from the Ikea Web site.
So where does the I-House fit in to the troubled times of the current housing market? Well, obviously, it’s not for everyone; even with several expansion modules added, large families will probably find it a bit small. But with big, expensive houses looking less attractive as investments — since their values are actually plummeting in many markets — and with energy costs virtually certain to climb in coming years, the market for a small but stylish house that has lots of high-end amenities with a low energy bill is likely to be pretty big.

Comments
andrea
on August 20, 2010, 4:45 pm
I am assuming that you are writing from the US. In most parts of the world, large families have no issue with living in less than a thousand square feet… it is only in the US that “small” space living is such an absurd concept. For many, a thousand square feet is more than a luxury. So even with all these additions you speak of, if you think it would be too small, then what is your article about exactly? I am confused as to what you think small space living is?
Tamara
on August 20, 2010, 5:08 pm
I am unsure of what you are critical about. If you could clarify, I will answer your critique. This article was sent to me by a reader who thought it might fit into my site. This concept is environmental and energy efficient. It was just to show other ideas for small space living. Thank you for your input and feel free to contribute at any time. BTW I live in Canada in a 500sq ft home. I live small space living. Have a great weekend.
andrea
on September 1, 2010, 6:47 am
I’m sorry if what I said came off as abrupt. I just question that in an article that is geared toward small space living (I appreciate that the eco and energy issues are relevant, but the article is labeled as referring to small space living, so I gather that that is the primary focus) the final part of the article is almost apologetic for being “too small”. I would think that the idea here is to celebrate downsizing. It is a very informative article, but doesn’t feel like it backs up the idea that small space living is doable unless you are single or a small family. I am not sure what the add ons take it to, but over 900 sq feet as a base is considered pretty normal in most places… places other than mcmansion zones. Not bitter, just would like to see the perspective changed to quality over quantity I suppose.
Tamara
on September 3, 2010, 9:06 pm
No apology necessary – you are who you are. Thank you for your input.